Lawyer Civility Applies to Emails: Alberta Court Rejects a “Private Communications” Defence
How the Alberta Court of Appeal approached civility in lawyers’ private email communications.
Join LinkedIn group
News & Insights
Explore published perspectives from The Legal Circle. Each topic below links to the articles currently available.
How the Alberta Court of Appeal approached civility in lawyers’ private email communications.
A professional-conduct decision with practical implications for written advocacy.
How California’s statute addresses lawyers’ verification, disclosure and confidentiality obligations.
The court’s treatment of professional obligations beyond the courtroom.
What the ruling says about protected editorial material and AI training inputs.
Why the relationship between competing legal research products mattered to fair use.
New statutory duties for lawyers and arbitrators using generative AI.
Questions legal technology teams should ask about data provenance and permissions.
What the enacted law says about confidential, identifying and nonpublic information entered into AI systems.
Why the responsible attorney must personally verify every citation in a court filing.
Three appellate elevations and five new Superior Court appointments announced October 1, 2026.
New members of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and the Superior Court of Justice.
Why appellate practitioners should follow official biographies and published reasons without predicting judicial outcomes.
Reported autonomous activity involving Library and Archives Canada’s public collection-search service.
What researchers observed, what the Canadian Cyber Centre said and what remains unproven.
Questions about instructions, permissions, monitoring and escalation when an AI agent encounters access restrictions.
A Canadian government response to reported suspicious activity affecting a public website.
A law firm model combining licensed attorneys with AI agents and proprietary software.
What a technology-supported service model suggests about scope, turnaround and client experience.
Flat-fee contract reviews and the commercial value of predictable pricing.
Service-design lessons for Canadian law firms considering clearer scope, prices and deadlines.
A jurisdictional appeal concerning bitcoin allegedly traced to accounts at an overseas exchange.
Which connections permit a Canadian court order to affect people or assets outside Canada?
The Court granted leave in the Nest Exchange jurisdictional dispute on October 1, 2026.
Questions about restraining and managing cryptocurrency allegedly connected to a Canadian fraud.
Why accurate filing review and the development of junior lawyers’ independent judgment are separate management concerns.
An interim appellate order pauses a Minnesota law imposing prevention duties on providers of covered AI services.
How Minnesota’s law approaches realistic synthetic intimate images of identifiable people.
Why prevention duties directed at service providers change the legal and product-design questions.
xAI’s constitutional challenge remains unresolved while its appeal proceeds.
How legal expertise becomes more relevant when marketing explains the client’s situation, options and next step.
Why anxious prospective clients benefit from clear, manageable information without exaggerated promises.
Practical ways to translate credentials and capabilities into useful, client-focused website language.
How specific commitments about consultations, scope, fees and communication can support trust.
What Canadian counsel can examine about safety decisions, internal controls and escalation.
What Canadian counsel can examine about safety decisions, internal controls and escalation.
What Canadian counsel can examine about safety decisions, internal controls and escalation.
Can a city use state tort law to make an energy company pay for climate-related harm - or does federal law prevent those claims from proceeding?
Can a city use state tort law to make an energy company pay for climate-related harm - or does federal law prevent those claims from proceeding?
Can a city use state tort law to make an energy company pay for climate-related harm - or does federal law prevent those claims from proceeding?
AI’s benefits may justify taking risks. But who decides which risks are acceptable - and who pays when they materialize?
AI’s benefits may justify taking risks. But who decides which risks are acceptable - and who pays when they materialize?
How firms identify connected matters and review earlier disclosures.
How firms identify connected matters and review earlier disclosures.
How firms identify connected matters and review earlier disclosures.
Questions about provenance, reliability and confidence in court processes.
Questions about provenance, reliability and confidence in court processes.